Meta-Analysis As A Research Tool: A Systematic Review Of Bibliometric Studies In Political Dynasty

Rahmad Agus Dwianto, Arief Bakhtiar Darmawan, Salahudin Salahudin
10.14203/jissh.v13i1.265
| Abstract views: 130

Abstract

Political dynasty practice in many democracy countries and sign of the flaws of democratic political systems in recent decades. It shows the inequality of justice, a crisis of trust, and democratic legal policies because families or groups controlled the government. The bibliographic review study examines the theory and practice of political dynasty in democratic countries through a different approach from the previous one, namely through literature studies of many Scopus indexed scientific articles from qualified researchers in the political field. Systematically bibliometric review can examine the study comprehensively and complete. The analysis uses VOSviewer and Nvivo to create linkage of the topic, grouping theme, mapping the dominant theme of a political dynasty. Based on cluster analysis with NVivo 12 plus sourced from 60 Scopus indexed articles, there are six clusters and five main topics about dynastic politics in a democratic country.

Keywords

Bibliometric; Democracy; Nvivo; Political Dynasty; VOSviewer

References

Aliotta, J. M. (2007). The Impact of Women in Congress. Perspectives on Politics, 5(04). https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592707072404

Asako, Y., Iida, T., Matsubayashi, T., & Ueda, M. (2015). Dynastic politicians: Theory and evidence from Japan. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 16(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S146810991400036X

Bó, E. D. A. L., Bó, P. D. A. L., & Snyder, J. (2009). Political Dynasties. Review of Economic St, 76, 115–142.

Feinstein, B. D. (2010). The dynasty advantage: Family ties in congressional elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 35(4), 571–598. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298010793322366

Geys, B. (2017a). Political Dynasties, Electoral Institutions and Politicians’ Human Capital. Economic Journal, 127(605), F474–F494. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12444

Geys, B. (2017b). Political Dynasties, Electoral Institutions and Politicians’ Human Capital. Economic Journal, 127(605), F474–F494. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12444

Guritno, D. C., Samudro, B. R., & Soesilo, A. M. (2019). The paradox of political dynasties of regeneration type and poverty in regional autonomy era. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 35(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-05-2018-0069

Isaev, I., Kornev, A., Lipen, S., & Zenin, S. (2020). The “machine of power” and aspects of political balance. Quaestio Rossica, 8(3), 979–992. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2020.3.507

Mendoza, R. U., Beja, E. L., Venida, V. S., & Yap, D. B. (2012). Inequality in democracy: Insights from an empirical analysis of political dynasties in the 15th Philippine Congress. Philippine Political Science Journal, 33(2), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2012.734094

Mendoza, R. U., Beja, E. L., Venida, V. S., & Yap, D. B. (2016). Political dynasties and poverty: measurement and evidence of linkages in the Philippines. Oxford Development Studies, 44(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1169264

Muslikhah, U., Hajri, W. A., & Santoso, D. (2019). Political dynasty and its implications for people’s welfare. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(2), 246–252.

Purdey, J. (2016). Narratives to power: The case of the Djojohadikusumo family dynasty over four generations. South East Asia Research, 24(3), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967828X16659728

Querubin, P. (2016). Family and politics: Dynastic persistence in the philippines. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 151–181. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014182

Reyes, J. A. L., Arce, B. G. C., & Madrid, N. B. N. (2018). Do money, power, family and connections really matter in politics? Analysing factors of success in the 2010, 2013 and 2016 Philippine senatorial elections. Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 36(2), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.22439/cjas.v36i2.5648

Rosser-Owen, M. (2014). Andalusi spolia in medieval Morocco: “Architectural politics, political architecture.” Medieval Encounters, 20(2), 152–198. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700674-12342164

Rossi, M A. (2017). Self-perpetuation of Political Power. Economic Journal, 127(605), F455–F473. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12443

Rossi, Martín A. (2017). Self-perpetuation of Political Power. Economic Journal, 127(605), F455–F473. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12443

Rubí, G. (2019). Oligarchic liberalism, caciquism and political democratisation between 1876 and 1923. The Catalan case. Catalan Historical Review, 12, 73–86. https://doi.org/10.2436/20.1000.01.157

Ruud, A. E., & Nielsen, K. B. (2018). Political Dynasticism: Networks, Trust, Risk. Studies in Indian Politics, 6(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/2321023018797407

Tusalem, R. F., & Pe-Aguirre, J. J. (2013). The effect of political dynasties on effective democratic governance: Evidence from the Philippines. Asian Politics and Policy, 5(3), 359–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12037

van Coppenolle, B. (2017). Political Dynasties in the UK House of Commons: The Null Effect of Narrow Electoral Selection. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 42(3), 449–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12164

Virola, R. A., Agtarap, K. F. S., Villanueva, P. C., & Villaruel, M. L. C. (2016). THE 2016 ELECTIONS AND THE GOOD GOVERNANCE INDEX : PERFORMANCE , PROMISES , OR POLITICAL DYNASTIES ? 1 By Governance is a critical concern in many countries , developing and developed countries alike . In fact , the Sustainable Development Goals ( SDGs ) .

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/jissh.v13i1.265
Copyright (c) 2024 Rahmad Agus Dwianto, Arief Bakhtiar Darmawan, Salahudin Salahudin
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.